Saturday, January 15, 2011

Series 7 Study Materials

There are all kinds of Series 7 study materials out there. Of course, I'm somewhat partial to the ones I write and produce. But, other companies have good questions, too, and if you have them, use them.
If you are on a budget, I recommend getting the Pass the 7 textbook and the Pass the 7 ExamCram Online at www.passthe7.com/exams.htm (hit continue shopping, etc.).
If you're not on quite as tight a budget, get the full package at www.passthe7.com/fullpackage.htm. This includes the audio lectures on CD and the DVD set that you can watch on your TV, with the ability to pause, review, fast-forward, etc.
Either way, make sure you learn as many vocabulary terms as possible, and focus on understanding concepts/how things work. You don't get to memorize a bunch of bullet points and merely spit them back at the testing center--the exam forces you to prove you can apply the information you've learned in some pretty creative ways.
So, study hard, everybody. The Series 7 doesn't play.

Churning and Defrauding the Sisters


In case it wasn't intuitive for you, please know that churning customer accounts is, like, bad. The SEC and FINRA consider it to be a prohibited and fraudulent practice. The practice of buying and selling, buying and selling, puts the customer's account at risk without affecting the broker in any way other than generating excessive commissions. Heads-he wins, tails-he wins, and either way, the customer loses. A broker will end up generating so much in commissions that the account can't possibly make money.
Which, again, is bad.
Here's a link to an SEC notice that will remind us that while churning is bad, churning and ripping off a convent of nuns is probably even worse. Notice how he not only (allegedly) traded too frequently, but also gouged the sisters (allegedly) with high markups/markdowns.
Wow. As a non-Catholic I can't even guess how many hail mary's this guy will need to say each day for the rest of his life . . . ?
http://sec.gov/news/press/2011/2011-2.htm

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

What is a "private" company?

While tutoring a young man recently, I realized that not everyone is clear what the terms "public company" and "private company" mean. When studying for questions on issuing securities and the Securities Act of 1933, it would probably help to understand the fundamental concepts, so let's say a few quick words. A "privately held company" is simply a company that has not yet raised money from public investors. Virtually all companies start as private companies--picture Mr. Jobs and Mr. Wozniak in the garage back in the day. Successful private companies start out using their own savings and credit cards to fund operations then move up to lines of credit from the local bank and, eventually, perhaps funding from rich "venture capitalists" or "private equity groups." These multimillion-dollar and billion-dollar private equity/VC funds become owners of major stakes in these growing private companies. For example, maybe they give the next Groupon $5 million in exchange for 30% ownership. Eventually, these backers are going to want to cash in their investment, either by selling to another private company with deeper pockets or doing an IPO through investment bankers like Goldman, Merrill, etc. When they access the public markets, they suddenly have to disclose all kinds of things they used to keep, yes, private. For example, a business magazine can look up exactly how much revenue and net income a public company like Microsoft took in last year. For a private company, they would often have to estimate, since the owners aren't likely to share their private business with outsiders.
While some public companies are massive--WalMart, Microsoft, Apple, American Express--that does not mean that all public companies are either large or even profitable. It also does not mean that private companies are necessarily small. While reading Crain's Chicago Business yesterday, I read a list of the largest private companies in the area. Check out some of the familiar names on this list:
  • CDW Corp.
  • Ace Hardware Corp.
  • True Value Co.
  • Follett Corp (college textbooks)
  • Solo Cup Co.
  • Crate & Barrel
  • Culligan International
  • Nuveen Investments (closed-end funds, e.g.)
  • Mesirow Financial Holdings

How much revenue do these companies make? Mesirow has the lowest among that group, which is still about $467 million a year! Another way to look at is that my office is about 100 yards from a privately held company called Ferrara Pan Candy Co. They make Lemonheads and other famous candies. They also did $322 million in revenue last year, making them only the 89th largest in the Chicago area . . . bigger than the Chicago Bears Football Club Inc. or Safeway Insurance.

Will these companies ever go public? Maybe. Or, maybe they don't need to and/or don't find it worth the hassle of filing registration and listing statements, quarterly and annual reports, etc. In any case, when we talk about "public companies," we simply mean those companies that have accessed the public markets by selling securities to finance their expansion. To make things a littler trickier, many public companies later get taken private again. For example, the Tribune Co. used to be a public company but is now the 10th largest private company in the area after Sam Zell, real estate mogul, put together a complex leveraged buyout. A "buyout" occurs when a group of private investors figures out a way to purchase the shares of a public company, often at a premium to their market price. For example, Zell's Equity Office Properties was a publicly traded REIT of which I owned a few shares . . . but was then taken private in a leveraged buyout.

Oh, I could go on, but this is probably enough excitement for one blog post.