Younger investors saving for retirement have a long time
horizon, so they can withstand more ups and downs along the road. On the other
hand, when you’re 69 years old, you probably need some income and maybe not so
much volatility in your investing life. So the farther from retirement she is,
the more likely she’ll be buying stock. The closer she gets to retirement, the
less stock she needs and the more bonds/income investments she should be
buying. In fact, you may have noticed that many mutual fund companies are taking
all of the work out of retirement planning for investors, and offering target funds. Here, the investor picks
a mutual fund with a target date close to her own retirement date. If she’s
currently in her mid 40s, maybe she picks the Target 2030 Fund. If she’s in her
mid 50s, maybe it’s the Target 2020 Fund. For the Target 2030, we’d see that
the fund is invested more in the stock market and less in the bond market than
the Target 2020 fund. In other words, the fund automatically changes the
allocation from mostly stock to mostly bonds as we get closer and closer to the
target date.Series 7 Exam Help
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Time Horizon
. . . Once we've determined the investor's investment objectives, it's time to talk about her time horizon. In general the longer the time horizon the more volatility the
investor can withstand. If you have a three-year time horizon, you need to stay
almost completely out of the stock market and invest instead in high-quality
bonds with short terms to maturity. If you’re in for the long haul, on the
other hand, who cares what happens this year? It’s what happens over a 20- or
30-year period that matters. With dividends reinvested, the S&P 500 has
historically gained about 10% annually on average, which means your money would
double approximately every 7 years. Sure, the index can drop 30% one year and
20% the next, but we’re not keeping score every year—it’s where we go over the
long haul that counts. A good way to see the real-world application of risk as
it relates to time horizon would be to pull out the prospectus for a growth
fund and see if you can spot any two- or three-year periods where the bar
charts are pointing the wrong way—then compare those horrible short-term
periods to the 10-year return, which is probably decent no matter which growth
fund you’re looking at. That’s why the prospectus will remind folks that they
“may lose money by investing in the fund” and that “the likelihood of loss is
greater the shorter the holding period.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment